tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7127907197734490257.post1418335157735290172..comments2020-01-18T14:45:13.981+01:00Comments on QSL Code Of Conduct: ControversialPE4BAS, Bashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12958141238330445285noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7127907197734490257.post-78424746810405767172015-12-22T13:24:39.655+01:002015-12-22T13:24:39.655+01:00I fully agree with your initiative on the QSL Code...I fully agree with your initiative on the QSL Code of Conduct. I would like to include in this Code of Conduct also the answering of electronic QSL cards in any way. There a lots of Hams waiting a long time for getting all the rare DXCC entities confirmed via QRZ.com, eQSL.cc, LoTW, et cetera. For me teh QSL Code of Conduct also means, that I really try to answer ALL of the electronic QSL requsts via ALL those electronic systems.<br />Unfortunately, my experience about that issue is quite different. Even those OMs, who themselves have thousands of QSOs in their electronic logbook and have received many awards there, unfortunately are no longer willing to help others to come to this status. For example in my logbook at QRZ.com up to 25% of the stations worked obviously had been working with that logbook system befor (because they have hundreds or even thousands of QSOs listed), but are not answering anylonger to a QSL request via that system! Shame on them! urbihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05322287521329564356noreply@blogger.com